Ethical issues associated with various technologies
Mar 13,23Question:
Background:
| Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines | |
| Unit Code | MN501 |
| Unit Title | Network Management in Organisations |
| Term, Year | T2 2020 |
| Assessment Type | Assignment 1A: 3%
Assignment 1B: 7% |
| Assessment Title | Ethical issues associated with various technologies |
| Purpose of the assessment (with ULO
Mapping) |
The purpose of this assignment is to comply with ULO b): Apply appropriate business communication, research standards in writing reports and in the presentation of research. |
| Weight | 10% |
| Total Marks | Assignment 1A: 10 Marks (3% actual weightage) Assignment 1B: 40 Marks (7% actual weightage) |
| Word limit | 1000 ( 1A: 350 words; 1B: 750 words) excluding title page and reference list |
| Due Date | Assignment 1A- Week 3, 7 August 2020 23:00 pm
Assignment 1B- Week 7, 4 Sep 2020 23:00 pm |
| Submission Guidelines | • All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.
• The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. |
| Extension | If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted online to AMS follow the link below you may require to login. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. https://online.mit.edu.au/ams/PublicDocs/Student/MIT_Special_Consideration_Application.pdf |
| Academic Misconduct | Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure availableat: https://www.mit.edu.au/about-mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure .For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. |
Assignment Topics
- Fog computing is becoming a promising computing paradigm that extends cloud computing functionalities. Discuss some key privacy and security issues that arise in fog computing and why these issues need to be
- Ransomware attacks are one of the key cybercrimes that affect businesses. Examine the various types of businesses that are targeted by cybercriminals for ransomware attacks and how can businesses protect themselves from these type of
- You develop IOT system for a client. During one of your meeting you highlight the importance of having updated firewall, encryption and filtering technologies to help detect and mitigate security threats. Your client is trying to persuade you not to worry too much about the security aspects and proceed with only basic security As a professional what would be your action? Will you proceed with less secure IOT system OR tell your client that you cannot proceed with the project with less security features. Use proper reasoning to justify your answer.
- Internet of Things (IOT) enabled devices usage has significantly increased in Australia over the past few A key risk with IOT enabled device is that it can be hacked and personal information can be stolen. Smart Parking is one example of IOT technology that have been used by city councils to manage parking issues. Discuss two key security issues in relation to using a Smart Parking App/System. Provide a detailed explanation of the issue and how consumers can safeguard themselves from these vulnerabilities.
- Wearable technologies have gained prominence in healthcare service sector over the past decade. Discuss in detail the type of patient data that are captured by wearable devices used in healthcare services (example aged care facilities, hospitals) and using suitable examples from your research explain what tools and techniques are available to effectively use this data to improve patient safety and service quality in aged care facilities/hospitals.
| Students with ID ending with | Answer scenario number |
| 0 or 5 | 0 |
| 1 or 6 | 1 |
| 2 or 7 | 2 |
| 3 or 8 | 3 |
| 4 or 9 | 4 |
Assignment Structure and submission guidelines:
Assignment1 is a formative assessment and is divided into two parts to assist students in having a steady learning curve based on feedback and revisions.
Part 1A of assignment 1 focuses on developing an annotated bibliography for the scenario you have selected for subsequent analysis. You need to use the template provided below for developing this annotated bibliography. 3 research sources (2 journal papers and 1 conference paper) need to be used for this assessment. Student should ensure that the research sources they have selected are published within the last 3 years (2017-2020). Students have to submit the first part by Week 3 due date mentioned in this document. This assessment will be marked by your respective tutor and written constructive feedback will be provided to students to help improve their research process and subsequent analysis that will be conducted in Part 1B of this assessment.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY TEMPLATE TO BE USED FOR PART 1A
| Article ID | What issue is examined in this article? | Howhave the authors approached this issue? i.e research approach | Discuss the relevance or usefulness of this research to your topic | Discuss 3 key ideas that emerged after you have read this article to help further your
research? |
| Article #1 (Journal
Paper 1) |
||||
| Article#2 (Journal Paper 2) | ||||
| Article#3
(Conference Paper 1) |
Part 1B of the assessment will require you do conduct systematic analysis based on the scenario you have selected earlier and also incorporate the feedback you have been provided for Part 1A assessment. You need to clearly indicate how the feedback that was provided in Week 3 assessment was incorporated in Part 1B. For example, if the tutor has provided a comment that issues that you have selected have not been examined in the specific context clearly, then you need to address how this comment is addressed in the revised document PART1B. It is your responsibility to clearly indicate this in Assignment 1B submission. Assignment 1B must be submitted by the due date in Week 7.
Structure to be used for PART1B:
| 1.Introduction to the topic |
| 2.Feedback from Part 1A and subsequent research |
| 3.Analysis of the identified issues |
| 4.Key arguments and recommendations that emerged from the analysis |
| 5.Conclusion |
| 6.Reference style |
Marking criteria:
Assignment PART1A:
| Assignment Topic | Marks |
| Article #1 (Journal Paper 1)
Has the student clearly summarised the issues and research approach? Is there a clear statement that highlights the usefulness of this article for research topic under examination? Are the ideas that emerged from initial analysis relevant and lays the foundation for more systematic examination |
3 Marks |
| Article#2 (Journal Paper 2)
Has the student clearly summarised the issues and research approach? Is there a clear statement that highlights the usefulness of this article for research topic under examination? Are the ideas that emerged from initial analysis relevant and lays the foundation for more systematic examination |
3 Marks |
| Article #3 (Conference Paper 1)
Has the student clearly summarised the issues and research approach? Is there a clear statement that highlights the usefulness of this article for research topic under examination? Are the ideas that emerged from initial analysis relevant and lays the foundation for more systematic examination |
2 Marks |
| Writing style consistent with academicconventionsincluding properreferencingand in-text citation | 2 Marks |
| Total Marks Part 1A | /10 |
Assignment 1B:
| Aspects | Description of the section | Marks |
| Introduction to the topic | Introduce the topic and list the key issues that is under examination. Provide succinct background information on the topic. | 5 |
| Feedback from Part 1A and subsequent research | Clearly summarise the feedback that was obtained from Part 1A and subsequent research that was carried out to address this feedback | 5 |
| Analysis of the issues | Analyse the identified issues in terms of their impact in organizational context | 10 |
| Evaluate and justify | Evaluate the issues and state your key argument or recommendations that emerged from this | 10 |
| Conclusion | Provide a clear summary of your analysis and key findings that emerged from it | 5 |
| Reference style | Follow IEEE reference style consistently | 5 |
| Total Marks Part 1B | /40 |
Marking Rubric: PART1B
| Grade Mark | HD 80-
100% |
DI 70-79% | CR 60-69% | P
50-59% |
Fail
<50% |
| Excellent | Very Good | Good | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory | |
| Introduction to topic
/5 |
All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is
demonstrated |
Topics are relevant and soundly analysed. | Generally relevant and analysed. | Some relevance and briefly presented. | This is not relevant to the assignment topic. |
| Feedback from Part 1A and incorporating it in Part 1B
/5 |
Excellent summary of the feedback that was obtained from Part 1A and subseque nt research that was carried out to address this feedback | Good summarize the feedback that was obtained from Part 1A and subsequent researchthat was carried out to address this feedback | Satisfactory summary of feedback that was obtained from Part 1A and
subsequent research that was carried out to address this feedback |
Some attempt in including feedback that was obtained from Part 1A and subsequent research that was carried out to address this feedback | Poor summary of the feedback that was obtained from Part 1A and subsequent research that was carried out to
address this feedback |
| Analysis of issues
/10 |
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately
Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments |
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately
Consistency logical and convincing |
Demonstrate d ability to
think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Mostly consistent logical and convincing |
Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately
Adequate cohesion and conviction |
Argument is confused and disjointed |
| Key arguments/recom mendations are well presented and information flow is coherent
/10 |
Excellent use of research sources. Outstanding effort. | Very good effort in integrating sources and making the information flow coherent | Good effort made at integrating sources but not outstanding | Made some Effort in integrating sources and making information flow coherent | Very little attempt integrating sources and making information flow coherent |
| Conclusion
/5 |
Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments | Consistency logical and convincing | Mostly consistent logical and convincing | Adequate cohesion and conviction | Argument is confused and disjointed |
| Referencing style
/5 |
Clear style with excellent source of references. | Clear referencing style | Generally good referencing style | Sometimes clear referencing style | Lacks consistency with many errors |
Answer:
Introduction
ETHICAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES
by (Name)
The Name of the Class (Course)
Professor (Tutor)
The Name of the School (University)
The City and State where it is located
The Date
Ethical Issues Associated with Wearable Technologies in Healthcare
Introduction to the Topic
The information has emerged to be a considerably important sector. Various concepts have been incorporated in other fields to enhance service provision to clients through the advancement and the resulting products. Healthcare is among the leading sectors in which the concept of wearable technologies has been incorporated and used in equipment like watches and Google glasses. Wearable technologies are gaining prominence in healthcare, having deemed to contribute to the effectiveness and the efficiency of understanding and attending to the health issues affecting various patients; consequently, the overall quality of healthcare services is facilitated. While the technology application is associated with positive impacts in the healthcare setting, controversies have arisen following possible ethical issues [1]. The ethical issues have sparked the need to research the topic to uncover different aspects as far as the healthcare sector continues to embrace and apply them. This has prompted the development of this paper presented around the type of patient data captured by wearable devices and the tools and techniques which can inform working with the data to improve patient safety. The report covers incorporating the feedback from the previous section, identified issues, and arguments and recommendations.
Feedback from part 1a and Subsequent Research
I read and incorporated the feedback from the last part of the assignment. For one, I included the title of the paper in the first column. This is important for my assignment’s identity so that the examiner knows what my paper is about, therefore making it easy for marking. Moreover, I added references to confirm that I did research and indicate the aspect of academic integrity; that is, citing consulted sources to embrace the concept of attribution. Besides, for the other column, I used the list format to present ideas in a precise manner. This will be important to ensure that the marker will identify the points communicating the identified ideas. To improve the assignment further, as directed by the previous feedback, I improved the covered concepts’ explanation. Further improvement of the assignment included the adjustment of the English to the Australian version and the use of the strict IEEE style of reference presentation.
Analysis of the Identified Issues
A potential ethical issue regarding wearable technologies is the possible misuse of patient data in a hospital setting. While they are used for patient and disease management misused data like prevention and understanding healthcare problems, sufficient data is revealed in the process. The employees may use private data for other purposes other than the intended use [4]. These may include the potential exploitation of users’ privacy, and the details may be wrongly made available to third parties beyond the use of healthcare professionals. This confirms the existence of a severe ethical with the use of wearable technology devices in the hospital.
Consequently, a bad influence can result, especially if the company lacks a strategy around the transparent on personal data [3]. Moreover, mostly, wearable devices’ application is based on the priority of the multifunction features rather than data safety. There is a potential loss of data since the three CIA triad concepts are not taken care of.
Key Arguments and Recommendations that Emerged from the Analysis
The article’s analysis reveals that the situation around the use of wearable technology devices in health is still controversial now that severe ethical problems may arise. This prompts the need to suggest approaches through which the technology can be used within ethical bounds to protect patient data [4]. For one, hospitals should create awareness for the employees, emphasizing the need to use the data for the intended purpose, specifically [2]. Moreover, there should be information security systems with the surveillance role regarding logs of the technology devices’ use.
Conclusion
Wearable technology devices are essential in healthcare settings regarding increasing the efficiency and quality of service provision. However, ethical issues make the application of the advancement concerning the operations around the personal data of patience. The ethical issues include the irresponsible use of the data and the expanded scope of use rather than the safety of data use. The ethical issues can be solved using auditing and training employees to gain competence around the prescribed ethical use of the technology.
References
[1]L. Segura Anaya, A. Alsadoon, N. Costadopoulos and P. Prasad, “Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-28, 2017. Available: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-017-9872-8.
[2]E. Bruno, A. Biondi, S. Thorpe and M. Richardson, “Patients self-mastery of wearable devices for seizure detection: a direct user-experience”, Seizure, 2020. Available: https://www.seizure-journal.com/inpress.
[3]H. Lewy, “Wearable technologies – future challenges for implementation in healthcare services”, Healthcare Technology Letters, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 2-5, 2015. Available: https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/htl.2014.0104.
[4]J. Wu, H. Li, S. Cheng and Z. Lin, “The promising future of healthcare services: When big data analytics meets wearable technology”, Information & Management, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1020-1033, 2016. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.im.2016.07.003.
0 responses on "Ethical issues associated with various technologies"